Shared governance is higher ed’s only choice
Shared governance is lamented by many as an impediment to change. Administration and faculty have a contentious relationship at many institutions, and this friction can
Shared governance is lamented by many as an impediment to change. Administration and faculty have a contentious relationship at many institutions, and this friction can
I reflect on my study for humanities and my career preparation.
I delve into my assertion that the marketplace for learning should become more important to the institution and faculty members when offering digital learning experiences.
In this longish essay, I reflect on what ChatGPT (and similar LLMs) means for the future of education.
There has been lots of conversation out in the open about the benefits of OPMs vs. fee-for-service. In this article, I expand on a point recently made by Phil Hill.
Too often, academic leaders limit themselves by thinking that their institution’s product is a credential. I propose something more productive.
The US Department of Education caused quite a stir recently with its recently published Dear Colleague letter related to Title IV programs. These programs are all those that have been certified to meet certain standards and thus can get federal funding for its students. Being certified is essentially mandated if the institution wants to stay in business.
Faculty changed how they taught during COVID. This could be important for the survival of higher ed.
Online credentials are equally accepted by hiring organizations. When might they be preferred?
Copyright © 2022 Palmetto Insights LLC. All rights reserved.
844-PALM824 | scott@palmettoinsights.com